According to the reading, why did the optimism of modernism fade in the 20th century?
No particular reason
Because everyone stopped reading the Enlightenment philosophers.
Because reason and science were used to accomplish great evil, not just good.
This question is misleading; modernism did not fade in the 20th century.
Because reason and science were used to accomplish great evil, not just good.
The optimism of modernism faded in the 20th century primarily because reason and science, which were key principles of modernism, were used to accomplish great evil, not just good. The 20th century witnessed the devastating impacts of two world wars, the rise of totalitarian regimes, genocide, and other atrocities, all of which were facilitated through advancements in technology and scientific knowledge. These events challenged the belief that progress and reason alone could lead to a perfect society and undermined the optimism of modernist ideals.
To answer this question, we need to refer to the reading and understand the context of the fading optimism of modernism in the 20th century. Here's how you can find the answer:
1. Identify the relevant reading or source: Look for the article or text that discusses the topic of modernism in the 20th century. Check if there are any specific points highlighted about the fading of optimism.
2. Read the relevant sections: Read the sections of the reading that discuss the reasons behind the fading optimism. Pay attention to any explanations or examples provided.
3. Analyze the information: Consider the different reasons mentioned in the reading. Evaluate each reason to determine if it explains why the optimism of modernism faded in the 20th century.
4. Select the correct option: Based on your analysis, select the option that aligns with the reasons mentioned in the reading. If none of the given options accurately reflects the information, consider the possibility that the question may be misleading or that the reading provides a different perspective.
Remember, it's important to rely on the information provided in the reading rather than making assumptions or drawing conclusions without proper evidence.