A student claims that hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces. Is he correct?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ANo, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.%0D%0ANo, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.%0D%0A%0D%0AYes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.%0D%0AYes, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.%0D%0A%0D%0ANo, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.%0D%0ANo, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.%0D%0A%0D%0AYes, because equal forces act on the ball from all sides.
No, because the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater.
No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
The correct answer is: No, because the force in the direction of the ball’s motion is greater.
To determine if hitting a tennis ball across the court is an example of balanced forces, we need to understand what balanced forces are. Balanced forces occur when the forces acting on an object are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, resulting in no net force acting on the object.
When hitting a tennis ball across the court, there are usually two forces acting on the ball: the force applied by the racket and the force of air resistance. These two forces are not balanced because they are not equal in magnitude or opposite in direction.
The force applied by the racket is greater than the force of air resistance. The force from the racket is directed towards the opposite side of the court, while the force of air resistance acts in the opposite direction of the ball's motion, trying to slow it down.
Therefore, since the forces are not balanced and the force in the direction of the ball's motion is greater, the student's claim is incorrect.