Category 4: Evaluate the Overall Effectiveness/Impact of each speech (2 +2 = 4) + (2 +2= 4) = (8 marks)
Speech 1:"i see something". Dananjaya Hettiarachchi Speech 2: "the power of words".Mohammed Qahtani
Category 3: Overall Effectiveness/Impact of Each Address (20 marks)
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
To evaluate the overall effectiveness/impact of each speech, you need to consider the most appealing aspects and reasons, as well as the least appealing aspects and reasons for each speech.
Start by analyzing Speech 1: "i see something" by Dananjaya Hettiarachchi. Consider what aspects of the speech were particularly appealing and why. Additionally, identify any aspects that were less appealing and provide reasons for this perception.
Next, move on to Speech 2: "the power of words" by Mohammed Qahtani. Again, highlight the most appealing aspects of the speech and explain why they stood out. Then, discuss any aspects that were least appealing and provide reasons for this assessment.
By completing these evaluations for each speech, you will be able to evaluate the overall effectiveness and impact of each address and assign appropriate scores based on the given marking scale.
Speech 1: "i see something" by Dananjaya Hettiarachchi
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
- Hettiarachchi's storytelling ability is captivating and keeps the audience engaged throughout the speech.
- The use of visualization techniques helps create a vivid picture in the minds of the listeners, making the speech more impactful.
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
- At times, Hettiarachchi's delivery seems overly dramatic, which may make it seem less authentic to some viewers.
- The speech could have provided more concrete examples or evidence to support the main points, as some viewers may find it lacking in substance.
Speech 2: "the power of words" by Mohammed Qahtani
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
- Qahtani's use of humor throughout the speech helps to lighten the mood and make it more enjoyable to watch.
- The storytelling elements used by Qahtani are relatable and make it easy for the audience to connect with his message.
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
- The speech lacks a clear structure, making it less cohesive and at times difficult to follow.
- Qahtani's delivery is sometimes monotonous, which may make it less engaging for some viewers.
Overall, both speeches have their own strengths and weaknesses in terms of effectiveness and impact. Hettiarachchi's speech excels in storytelling and visualization techniques, but can at times come across as overly dramatic. Qahtani's speech is enjoyable and relatable, but lacks a clear structure and engaging delivery. Both speeches could benefit from providing more concrete examples or evidence to support their main points.
To evaluate the overall effectiveness/impact of each speech, you can start by analyzing the most appealing aspects and the least appealing aspects of each speech.
For Speech 1, titled "i see something" by Dananjaya Hettiarachchi, some possible most appealing aspects could be:
1. Engagement: Hettiarachchi may have effectively engaged the audience through his delivery style, body language, or use of storytelling.
2. Emotional connection: He might have established a strong emotional connection with the audience through the content or delivery of his speech.
3. Message clarity: Hettiarachchi may have effectively conveyed his message and made it easily understandable for the audience.
Some possible least appealing aspects of Speech 1 could be:
1. Lack of structure: The speech may have lacked a clear structure or flow, which could make it difficult for the audience to follow.
2. Weak supporting evidence: Hettiarachchi's arguments or examples may not have been well-supported, weakening the overall impact of the speech.
3. Delivery issues: There could have been problems with his vocal projection, clarity, or timing, which might have affected the overall effectiveness of the speech.
For Speech 2, titled "the power of words" by Mohammed Qahtani, you can evaluate the most appealing aspects, such as:
1. Persuasive techniques: Qahtani may have effectively used persuasive techniques such as storytelling, analogies, or logical reasoning to deliver his message.
2. Engaging delivery: His delivery style might have kept the audience interested and engaged throughout the speech.
3. Memorable content: Qahtani may have presented unique or thought-provoking content that stayed with the audience even after the speech ended.
For the least appealing aspects of Speech 2, some possible points could be:
1. Lack of audience connection: Qahtani may have failed to establish a strong connection with the audience, leading to a lack of impact.
2. Overuse of certain techniques: If Qahtani relied too heavily on a particular technique or style of delivery, it might have become repetitive or less effective over time.
3. Lack of clarity: The overall message or main ideas of the speech may not have been effectively communicated, causing confusion or disinterest among the audience.
By considering the most and least appealing aspects of each speech, you can evaluate the overall effectiveness and impact of Speech 1 by Dananjaya Hettiarachchi and Speech 2 by Mohammed Qahtani.