Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?(1 point)ResponsesIt was not helpful to any section of the country.It was not helpful to any section of the country.It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.It increased the market for cotton.It increased the market for cotton.It increased foreign competition.

It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.

It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.

The primary reason why Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued it should be nullified is that they believed it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another. To understand this more clearly, let's break down the explanation further:

1. To start, Southerners believed that the increased tariff was not helpful to any section of the country. This means that they felt it did not bring any benefits or advantages to any region, and thus, they saw no reason to support it.

2. However, the main objection from the Southern perspective was that the tariff disproportionately favored one section of the country over another. This means that they believed the tariff provided advantages to other regions at the expense of the South.

3. One way this tariff was seen as favoring other regions was through the increase in the market for cotton. The South was heavily reliant on growing and exporting cotton, and an increased tariff would potentially lead to a decrease in demand for Southern cotton. Therefore, Southerners resisted the tariff because they saw it as negatively impacting their primary economic activity.

4. Another aspect to consider is the potential increase in foreign competition. With an increased tariff, it becomes more expensive for foreign goods to enter the country. However, this could also result in other countries imposing tariffs on American goods, making it more difficult for Southern cotton to be exported. Southerners, fearing the loss of their cotton market, argued against the increased tariff.

In summary, Southerners opposed and wanted to nullify the increased tariff in 1828 because they believed it benefited other regions at the expense of the South, particularly by potentially decreasing the market for cotton and increasing foreign competition.

Which of the following did Andrew Jackson believe made the federal government “subversive to the rights of the states” and was a monopoly controlled by foreigners and the rich?(1 point)ResponsesThe Bank of the United StatesThe Bank of the United StatesThe United States ConstitutionThe United States ConstitutionThe Electoral CollegeThe Electoral CollegeThe Indian Removal Act

The Bank of the United States.

What is the unanswered question of the Nullification Crisis?(1 point)ResponsesDoes the federal government have absolute power to place tariffs on goods?Does the federal government have absolute power to place tariffs on goods?Do the states have the right to nullify other states’ laws?Do the states have the right to nullify other states’ laws?Does the federal government or do the states have greater rights and powers?Does the federal government or do the states have greater rights and powers?Do the states have the right to secede from the union?

Do the states have the right to nullify other states' laws?