Video is now a permanent part of journalism. Based on what you know about the development of the photojournalism, which BEST explains how this became popular?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AGraphic designers were able to create chyrons to identify news organizations.%0D%0A%0D%0AGraphic designers were able to create chyrons to identify news organizations.%0D%0A%0D%0AVideo footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.%0D%0A%0D%0AVideo footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.%0D%0A%0D%0AGraphic designers prefer to work with video footage, so they changed photojournalism.%0D%0A%0D%0AGraphic designers prefer to work with video footage, so they changed photojournalism.%0D%0A%0D%0AVideo footage is now much more available than photography, replacing photos entirely.
The correct answer is: Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.
The correct answer is:
Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.
To find the best explanation for why video has become a permanent part of journalism, we need to consider the development of photojournalism.
Photojournalism has a long history of visually capturing important events and telling stories through images. However, the rise of video in journalism can be attributed to several factors:
1. Graphic designers were able to create chyrons to identify news organizations.
- This response does not directly explain why video became popular in journalism. Chyrons are graphics displayed on TV screens that provide information like news organization identification or contextual information. While chyrons may be used in video journalism, they are not the primary factor driving the popularity of video.
2. Video footage became cheap and efficient to produce and could be made daily.
- This response provides a valid explanation for the popularity of video in journalism. With technological advancements, video cameras have become more affordable and accessible, enabling journalists to capture moving images easily and quickly. The ability to produce video content daily has made it a preferred medium for reporting news events in real-time.
3. Graphic designers prefer to work with video footage, so they changed photojournalism.
- This response suggests that graphic designers influenced the shift from photojournalism to video journalism. However, it is important to note that photojournalism and video journalism involve different skill sets and roles. While graphic designers may work on video editing and graphics, their preference alone is not the primary reason for video's popularity in journalism.
4. Video footage is now much more available than photography, replacing photos entirely.
- This response is not entirely accurate. While video has gained prominence in journalism, it has not completely replaced photography. Many news organizations still rely on photographs to tell stories and provide visual context. Video and photography serve different purposes and coexist in journalism.
Considering the explanations provided, the most accurate and relevant explanation for the popularity of video in journalism is that video footage has become cheap and efficient to produce, allowing daily coverage of news events.