What was the significance of Shays' Rebellion? (1 point)
• It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work
© It was the first time farmers rebelled against the government
O Farmers got more money for their farms from the government
O Farmers had a cause to join
• It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work
The correct answer is:
• It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work
Shays' Rebellion, which occurred in 1786-1787, was a significant event in American history because it revealed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The rebellion was led by Massachusetts farmer Daniel Shays and a group of other farmers who were struggling with debt and high taxes. They rebelled against the state government, demanding relief from their economic hardships. The rebellion highlighted the problems with the weak central government created by the Articles of Confederation, as it was unable to effectively respond to the rebellion and maintain order. This event contributed to the push for a stronger federal government, ultimately leading to the Constitutional Convention and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
The correct answer is: It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work.
To determine the significance of Shay's Rebellion, we need to understand what it was and the context in which it occurred. Shays' Rebellion was an armed uprising that took place in Massachusetts in 1786 and 1787. It was led by a former Revolutionary War captain named Daniel Shays and involved farmers who were experiencing financial difficulties and anger over high taxes and foreclosure of their farms.
To assess the significance of the rebellion, it is important to consider the broader historical context. At the time, the United States was governed under the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government with limited powers. The Articles had several shortcomings, including the inability to raise revenue, regulate commerce, or enforce laws. This made it challenging for the government to deal effectively with issues like economic turmoil and civil unrest.
Shays' Rebellion exposed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and highlighted the need for a stronger central government. The rebellion demonstrated that without a capable authority to maintain order and address economic grievances, there was a potential for widespread social unrest and instability. This realization played a significant role in prompting the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where the Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the United States Constitution. The Constitution established a more robust federal government with expanded powers, including the ability to collect taxes, regulate trade, and maintain a standing army. Hence, Shays' Rebellion served as a catalyst for the adoption of the Constitution, which created a more effective framework for governing the young nation.
The Articles of Confederation had strengths and weaknesses. Match the items to the things that The Articles of Confederation could do and the things it could not do. (3 points)
Could Do
Could Not Do
# limit the federal government
:: resolve conflicts between states :: coin money
:: control trade between the states ::collect taxes
# operate post offices
Could Do:
- Limit the federal government
- Operate post offices
Could Not Do:
- Resolve conflicts between states
- Coin money
- Control trade between the states
- Collect taxes
The Three-Fifths Compromise said that (1 point)
O Three-fifths of the states must be free states
O Congress would spend three-fifths of the year in session
• Three-fifths of slaves in the South would be freed
• Three-fifths of slaves would be counted to decide representation numbers in Congress
• Three-fifths of slaves would be counted to decide representation numbers in Congress
Which of these people and documents did not influence the founding fathers when they were writing the Constitution?
(1 point)
• Magna Carta
• The English Bill of Rights
• John Locke
• The Treaty of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles did not influence the founding fathers when they were writing the Constitution.
Who is often called the "Father of the Constitution"? (1 point)
O Alexander Hamilton
• George Washington
O Ben Franklin
• James Madison