The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits evidence obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights from being used against them in a court of law. It is based on the idea that illegally obtained evidence is tainted and should not be admitted as proof of guilt. The rule is intended to deter law enforcement from engaging in unconstitutional searches and seizures and to protect individuals' Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle in the United States that prohibits illegally obtained evidence from being used in a criminal trial. It is meant to deter law enforcement officers from engaging in unconstitutional searches and seizures. The exclusionary rule was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Weeks v. United States in 1914 and later extended to state courts in the case of Mapp v. Ohio in 1961. This rule is based on the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. To understand more about the exclusionary rule, you can study constitutional law and its court cases or seek legal textbooks and articles.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights, particularly their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. It essentially means that if law enforcement officers obtain evidence illegally (such as through an unlawful search or seizure), that evidence may be excluded or suppressed from use in a criminal trial. The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter law enforcement officers from engaging in unlawful conduct and to protect individuals' constitutional rights.
simple version
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that says if the police obtain evidence in an illegal or unconstitutional way, it cannot be used in court against the person they collected it from.
Why are the Eighth Amendment's protections against cruel and unusual punishment important?(1 point)
The Eighth Amendment's protections against cruel and unusual punishment are important because they ensure that individuals are not subjected to excessively harsh or inhumane treatment or punishment by the government. It serves as a safeguard against torture, extreme physical or mental suffering, or any form of punishment that goes beyond what is necessary or proportionate. The Eighth Amendment helps to uphold the principles of fairness, human dignity, and the respect for basic human rights within the criminal justice system.
Why are individuals with intellectual disabilities not allowed to be sentenced to death?(1 point)
Individuals with intellectual disabilities are not allowed to be sentenced to death because it violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court has recognized that intellectual disabilities impair an individual's capacity for moral culpability and understanding the consequences of their actions. Executing someone with an intellectual disability would be deemed disproportionate and unjust, as it fails to respect their individual circumstances and inherent dignity. The exclusion of individuals with intellectual disabilities from the death penalty is a recognition of their vulnerability and the need for a more compassionate approach to justice.
Which of the following summarizes the analysis used by the Supreme Court in cases regarding the rights of criminal defendants?(1 point)
