Analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery.(1 point) Responses They left it up to the individual states. They left it up to the individual states. They pretended slavery did not exist. They pretended slavery did not exist. They let Stephen F. Austin decide. They let Stephen F. Austin decide. They let each person decide for themselves.
One possible analysis of how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery is as follows:
The Mexican government employed various strategies to avoid making a definitive decision on slavery. Firstly, they adopted a strategy of devolving the responsibility to the individual states. By leaving the issue in the hands of the states, the government effectively skirted the need to establish a unified national stance on slavery. This approach allowed the individual states to determine their own policies and regulations regarding slavery.
In addition, the Mexican government pretended that slavery did not exist. By turning a blind eye to the presence of slavery, they avoided directly addressing the contentious issue. This diplomatic tactic allowed them to maintain a facade of neutrality and avoid taking a clear stance on the matter.
Another strategy employed was entrusting the decision-making power to influential individuals like Stephen F. Austin. By granting power to figures such as Austin, the Mexican government hoped to avoid the responsibility of making a direct decision on slavery. Instead, they relied on the judgement and authority of individuals who were intimately familiar with the local contexts and dynamics.
Lastly, the Mexican government also allowed each person to decide for themselves. This approach, known as individual liberty, effectively shifted the responsibility onto the private citizens. By allowing individuals to make their own choices regarding slavery, the government absolved itself of making an official, nationwide decision.
In conclusion, the Mexican government cleverly evaded making a definitive decision on slavery by employing various strategies. These included devolving responsibility to the states, pretending slavery did not exist, relying on influential individuals, and allowing individuals to choose for themselves. By employing these tactics, the Mexican government avoided taking a firm stance on the divisive issue of slavery.
To analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery, we can look at the options provided and break them down:
1. They left it up to the individual states.
2. They pretended slavery did not exist.
3. They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
4. They let each person decide for themselves.
Based on these responses, it seems that the Mexican government took a relatively hands-off approach to the issue of slavery, allowing different entities or individuals to make decisions about it.
The first option suggests that the Mexican government devolved the authority to decide on slavery to the individual states within the country. This would mean that each state had the freedom to establish its own policy on whether to permit or prohibit slavery.
The second option states that the Mexican government pretended slavery did not exist. This could mean that they chose to ignore or not address the issue altogether, possibly avoiding taking a stance on or implementing any policies related to slavery.
The third option indicates that Stephen F. Austin, a prominent figure in the history of Texas, was given the authority to make decisions regarding slavery. This suggests that the Mexican government gave him substantial influence over the issue, potentially relying on his judgment or recommendations.
The final option states that the Mexican government allowed each person to decide for themselves. This implies a laissez-faire approach, wherein individuals were given the agency to either choose or reject slavery on a personal level, rather than having a centralized decision imposed upon them.
In summary, the Mexican government's avoidance of making a clear decision about slavery likely involved a combination of delegating authority to states, turning a blind eye to the issue, relying on influential individuals like Stephen F. Austin, and allowing personal choices on a case-by-case basis. It is important to note that this analysis is based on the information provided and may not encompass the full context of Mexico's approach to slavery.
The Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery in several ways:
1. They left it up to the individual states: The Mexican government did not impose a unified policy on slavery and instead allowed each state to decide for itself whether to allow or abolish slavery.
2. They pretended slavery did not exist: In some cases, the Mexican government chose to ignore the issue of slavery and refused to acknowledge its presence or actively address it.
3. They let Stephen F. Austin decide: Stephen F. Austin, an influential American empresario and land agent in Mexico's northeastern region, played a role in determining the presence of slavery in the territories he governed. His decisions regarding slavery were influential in shaping the local policies.
4. They let each person decide for themselves: In certain instances, the Mexican government allowed individuals to decide for themselves whether to partake in or abstain from the institution of slavery.
Overall, the Mexican government's avoidance of making a decision about slavery involved giving power to individual states, ignoring the issue, relying on influential figures like Stephen F. Austin, and allowing personal choices regarding slavery.