What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. The court must review all cases where a review is requested. The court must review all cases where a review is requested. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. Skip to navigation page 20 of 20
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case.
To best describe the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari, we can look at the options provided.
Option 1: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
Option 2: The court must review all cases where a review is requested.
Option 3: A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case.
Option 4: A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case.
According to the process, a writ of certiorari is granted when the Supreme Court agrees to review a case. To reach this decision, the Court must consider the requests for review received from parties involved in the case. Typically, these requests are filed as petitions for certiorari. However, the Court has full discretion in deciding which cases it will hear.
Option 1 states that a vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. This statement is correct. In order for a case to be granted a writ of certiorari, at least four of the nine justices must vote in favor of reviewing it. This option accurately reflects the process.
Option 2 states that the court must review all cases where a review is requested. This statement is incorrect. The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case that a petition is filed for. The Court has limited resources, and it chooses to prioritize cases that raise important legal issues or that present conflicting rulings among lower courts.
Option 3 states that a majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. This statement is incorrect. As previously mentioned, only four votes are needed to grant a review of the case, not five.
Option 4 states that a unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. This statement is incorrect. Again, only four votes are required to grant a review.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.