Which statement accurately contrasts the concepts of loose construction and strict construction?(1 point) Responses Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written. Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written. Loose construction interprets the Constitution as the original intent of its authors, whereas strict construction allows for interpretations to reflect modern-day issues. Loose construction interprets the Constitution as the original intent of its authors, whereas strict construction allows for interpretations to reflect modern-day issues. Loose construction was favored by the Anti-Federalists and strict construction was favored by the Federalists. Loose construction was favored by the Anti-Federalists and strict construction was favored by the Federalists. Loose construction allows for limited federal power, whereas strict construction allows for more federal power.
Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written.
The correct statement that accurately contrasts the concepts of loose construction and strict construction is: "Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written."
To better understand the concepts of loose construction and strict construction, it is important to consider their definitions:
1. Loose construction: This concept refers to a broad interpretation of the Constitution, where the meaning of its provisions can be expanded or adapted to fit current circumstances or issues. Those who embrace loose construction believe that the Constitution is a living document and that its interpretation should evolve over time.
2. Strict construction: On the other hand, strict construction adheres to a literal interpretation of the Constitution, taking its words and provisions at face value. Advocates of strict construction argue that the original intent of the Constitution's authors should be respected and that any changes or adjustments should be made through the formal amendment process.
Based on these definitions, we can identify the contrast between the two concepts. The statement correctly points out that loose construction allows for a broad interpretation of the Constitution, while strict construction emphasizes interpreting it exactly as it is written.