The conclusion to Doug's essay on the importance of arts education in schools reads, "While not every student will grow up to become an artist, 1.4% of working Americans are artists." Which rewrite would improve his conclusion?(1 point)

Responses

No improvement is needed.
No improvement is needed.

While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.
While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.

We teach health even though only 0.7% of working Americans are doctors, yet 1.4% of working Americans are artists.
We teach health even though only 0.7% of working Americans are doctors, yet 1.4% of working Americans are artists.

Artists are very important, and we should encourage more of them.

While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.

The rewrite that would improve Doug's conclusion is: "While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life." This statement provides a more persuasive and convincing argument for the importance of arts education. If you want to improve a conclusion like this, you should focus on summarizing the main points of the essay and leaving the reader with a strong final thought. In this case, the rewrite emphasizes the value of art in everyone's life, regardless of their career choices, which strengthens the overall argument.

While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.