Which of the following explains the effects of Sundiata Keita's establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais? (1 point)

1. These actions meant that Mali lost control of powerful trading cities such as Goa and Timbuktu.

2. These actions helped create a social class system in Mali that hurt the economy.

3. These actions helped strengthen Mali's economy because it made trading easier.

4. These actions contributed to hyperinflation in many economies outside of Mali.

3. These actions helped strengthen Mali's economy because it made trading easier.

The correct answer is:

3. These actions helped strengthen Mali's economy because it made trading easier.

To determine the correct answer, let's analyze each option:

1. These actions meant that Mali lost control of powerful trading cities such as Goa and Timbuktu.
This option suggests that establishing trading outposts and caravanserais caused Mali to lose control of important trading cities. However, Sundiata Keita's establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais actually aimed to expand Mali's influence in trade, so this option is not accurate.

2. These actions helped create a social class system in Mali that hurt the economy.
This option claims that Sundiata Keita's actions led to the creation of a social class system that negatively impacted the economy. There is no direct link between establishing trading outposts and caravanserais and the creation of a social class system. Therefore, this option is unlikely to be the correct answer.

3. These actions helped strengthen Mali's economy because it made trading easier.
This option suggests that Sundiata Keita's actions had a positive effect on Mali's economy by facilitating trade. Establishing trading outposts and caravanserais would make trading easier, as they provided infrastructure and facilities to support commercial exchanges. This option aligns with the aim of establishing such outposts, so it may be the correct answer.

4. These actions contributed to hyperinflation in many economies outside of Mali.
This option claims that establishing trading outposts and caravanserais caused hyperinflation in economies outside of Mali. There is no evidence to indicate that Mali's trading actions resulted in hyperinflation elsewhere, so this option seems less likely to be the correct answer.

Based on the analysis, option 3 seems to be the most accurate. Establishing trading outposts and caravanserais would have helped strengthen Mali's economy by facilitating trade.