Which of the following best explains an external, immediate cause of the fall of the Ghana Empire? (1 point)
1. its absorption by the Mali Empire
2. the collapse of its trading empire
3. the attack of its capital city by the Susu
4. the decision by its kings not to convert to Islam
1. its absorption by the Mali Empire
To determine the best explanation for an external, immediate cause of the fall of the Ghana Empire, let's analyze each option:
1. Absorption by the Mali Empire: This option suggests that the Mali Empire taking over Ghana could be the cause. To verify this, we can research the historical events surrounding the fall of the Ghana Empire, specifically looking for information about the Mali Empire's involvement.
2. Collapse of its trading empire: This option proposes that the decline of Ghana's trading network played a role in its fall. To confirm this, we need to investigate whether there were any significant disruptions or changes in Ghana's trading relationships during this time.
3. Attack of its capital city by the Susu: This option claims that the Susu attacked the capital city of Ghana, potentially leading to its downfall. To determine the validity of this, we can search for historical records or accounts that document an attack on Ghana by the Susu.
4. Decision by its kings not to convert to Islam: This option suggests that Ghana's kings' refusal to convert to Islam could have contributed to the empire's decline. To assess this, we can examine the historical context of the time period, looking for evidence of any negative consequences resulting from the kings' decision.
By conducting research into the historical events and analyzing various sources, we can determine which option provides the best explanation for the external, immediate cause of the Ghana Empire's fall.
The correct answer is:
1. its absorption by the Mali Empire