Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?
(1 point)
tiem
Item 2
Item 3
• It was not helpful to any section of the country.
• It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
• It increased the market for cotton.
• It increased foreign competition.
The correct option is: It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued that it should be nullified for several reasons:
1. It was not helpful to any section of the country: Southerners believed that the increased tariff did not benefit any region of the country equally. They felt that it primarily favored the Northern states and neglected the interests of the Southern states.
2. It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another: Southerners believed that the increased tariff unfairly benefited Northern industries while putting a heavier burden on Southern agrarian economy. They saw it as a form of economic exploitation by the North.
3. It increased the market for cotton: Despite the negative implications on their economy, Southerners recognized that the increased tariff could potentially expand the market for their primary cash crop, cotton. By reducing competition from foreign goods, it was expected to boost the demand for Southern cotton.
4. It increased foreign competition: On the other hand, Southerners also feared that the increased tariff would make it more difficult for them to export their cotton to foreign markets due to retaliatory tariffs from other countries. They were concerned that foreign competition would decrease and harm their profits.
Overall, these reasons contributed to the Southern resistance against the increased tariff in 1828 and their arguments for nullification.
Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification for several reasons. One of the main reasons was that they believed the tariff was not beneficial to any section of the country. To understand why they thought this way, we need to look at the details of the tariff and its impact.
To start, it's important to note that a tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods. In this case, the 1828 tariff, also known as the Tariff of Abominations, imposed high taxes on imported goods, particularly manufactured goods from Europe. The purpose of this tariff was to protect American industries by making foreign goods more expensive and thus encouraging consumers to buy domestically produced goods.
However, this tariff disproportionately affected the Southern states, as they relied heavily on imported manufactured goods. Southerners argued that the tariff benefited one section of the country, namely the industrialized North, at the expense of the agrarian South. They believed that the tariff unfairly increased the cost of goods they relied on, such as textiles and machinery, making their cost of living higher.
Additionally, the increased tariff negatively impacted Southern agricultural exports, particularly cotton. The South was a major exporter of cotton, and they feared that the higher tariff would lead to reduced demand for their cotton in foreign markets. This concern about increased foreign competition arose because the tariff made imported goods more expensive for other countries as well, potentially making them less willing to buy Southern cotton.
In summary, Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 because they believed it was not helpful to any section of the country and instead benefited the North at the expense of the South. They also feared that the tariff would increase the market for cotton, which was a major economic driver in the South, and increase foreign competition. By nullifying the tariff, they hoped to protect their economic interests and address what they saw as unfair trade policies.