China spends 1.9% of its GDP per year on education and Japan spends 3.5% of its GDP on education. Which statement is the most logical conclusion about the effects of such spending?

Responses
A Japan has lower literacy rates and a lower GDP than China.Japan has lower literacy rates and a lower GDP than China.
B China has lower literacy rates but a higher GDP than Japan.China has lower literacy rates but a higher GDP than Japan.
C Japan has higher literacy rates and a higher GDP than China.Japan has higher literacy rates and a higher GDP than China.
D There is no relationship between the literacy rates and GDPs of the two nations.

C - Japan has higher literacy rates and a higher GDP than China.

To determine the most logical conclusion about the effects of education spending on literacy rates and GDP, we need to analyze the given information about China and Japan.

China spends 1.9% of its GDP on education, while Japan spends 3.5% of its GDP on education. This implies that Japan invests a higher percentage of its GDP in education compared to China.

Now, let's evaluate the statements:

A) "Japan has lower literacy rates and a lower GDP than China."
This statement cannot be concluded from the information provided. While we know that Japan spends a higher percentage of its GDP on education, we do not have information about the literacy rates or GDP of either country.

B) "China has lower literacy rates but a higher GDP than Japan."
Again, this statement cannot be concluded from the information given. We know that China spends a lower percentage of its GDP on education, but we do not know the literacy rates or GDP of either country.

C) "Japan has higher literacy rates and a higher GDP than China."
This statement cannot be reasonably concluded from the given information. While we know that Japan spends a higher percentage of its GDP on education, we do not have information about the literacy rates or GDP of either country.

D) "There is no relationship between the literacy rates and GDPs of the two nations."
This statement is the most logical conclusion based on the information provided. Since we do not have information about the literacy rates and GDPs of China and Japan, we cannot determine any relationship between the two.

Therefore, the most logical conclusion based on the given information is option D - "There is no relationship between the literacy rates and GDPs of the two nations."

The most logical conclusion about the effects of such spending is that there is no relationship between the literacy rates and GDPs of the two nations. Therefore, the correct answer is option D: "There is no relationship between the literacy rates and GDPs of the two nations."