What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. The court must review all cases where a review is requested.
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
The correct answer is:
A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
The correct response is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
To understand why this is the correct answer, it's important to have some background knowledge about the Supreme Court's process for granting certiorari (or cert for short). Certiorari is the legal term used to describe the Supreme Court's decision to review a case.
The Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions for certiorari each year, but it only has the capacity to review a small fraction of them. To determine which cases to review, the Court uses the "Rule of Four." This means that if at least four of the nine justices vote in favor of granting cert, the case will be taken up for review.
Once four justices agree to review a case, a writ of certiorari is issued. This writ is a formal order from the Supreme Court directing a lower court to send up the records of a case for review.
So, in summary, the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari involves a vote of four justices in favor of the review. The other answer choices in the question are incorrect because they either mention a unanimous vote (which is not required) or a majority vote of five justices (which is not the threshold for granting certiorari).