why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?
a. it was not helpful to any section of the country.
b. It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
c. It increased the market for cotton.
d: it increase foreign competition
b. It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
The correct answer is b. It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
The increased tariff in 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations, imposed higher import duties on a variety of goods that were primarily purchased by Southern states. The Southern economy relied heavily on agriculture, especially cotton, which was exported to foreign markets. The tariff significantly raised the cost of imported goods for the South, making it more expensive for them to purchase necessary manufactured products.
At the same time, the tariff was beneficial for Northern manufacturers, as it protected their industries from foreign competition by making imported goods more expensive. This growing sectional imbalance in economic benefits led many Southerners to argue that the tariff should be nullified, as they believed it unfairly advantaged one section of the country (the North) at the expense of another (the South).
The Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued that it should be nullified for several reasons. One of the reasons is that they believed the tariff was not helpful to any section of the country (option a). Southerners argued that the increased tariff did not provide any significant benefits for their region and instead favored other parts of the country.
Another reason for the Southern resistance was that they believed the increased tariff benefited one section of the country at the expense of another (option b). According to the Southerners, the tariff placed a heavier burden on the agricultural South, particularly on their cash crop, cotton. They argued that the tariff protected and supported the industrial interests of the North, while inhibiting the Southern agricultural economy.
Additionally, the Southerners were concerned that the increased tariff would lead to foreign competition (option d). They argued that by increasing the cost of imported goods, the tariff could provoke other countries to retaliate with higher tariffs on American exports, particularly cotton. This would restrict the market for Southern cotton and potentially harm their economy.
Overall, the resistance to the increased tariff in 1828 by Southern states was based on a combination of factors including its perceived lack of benefits to the South, its favoring of other regions, and the potential negative impact on foreign competition.