The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point) Responses The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause. The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Question

The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point) Responses The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause. The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Answer 1

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Answer 2

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were ruled as a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Answer 3

In JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994), the Supreme Court case involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. To analyze the case and determine the most likely reason for the ruling, we need to consider the relevant factors and legal principles involved.

Peremptory challenges refer to the right of attorneys to reject potential jurors without providing a specific reason. The key issue in this case was whether peremptory challenges on the basis of gender violated the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to a fair trial.

The practice of gender-based peremptory challenges was challenged by the petitioner, JEB (John E. B.), who argued that it discriminated against him based on his gender. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Therefore, the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. was that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were deemed unconstitutional and a violation of the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a fair trial.

To find this answer, one could conduct legal research by reading the relevant court documents, opinions, and analysis of the case. Additionally, one could consult legal experts or authoritative sources discussing the case and its implications.