Question Which option best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution?(1 point) Responses Urbanization has increased population density as people move to cities for jobs. Urbanization has increased population density as people move to cities for jobs. Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities. Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities. Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes. Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes. Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.

Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.

The option that best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution is: Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.

To determine the correct option that best describes how physical geography influenced modern population distribution, let's review each option:

Option 1: Urbanization has increased population density as people move to cities for jobs.
This option suggests that the growth of cities due to urbanization has resulted in an increased population density. People move to cities in search of job opportunities. While this statement acknowledges the impact of urbanization on population distribution, it does not explicitly mention physical geography as the influencing factor.

Option 2: Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities.
This option suggests that cultural hearths, which are regions where civilizations originated and spread from, attract migrants and subsequently increase population density in nearby cities. While this statement recognizes the influence of cultural factors on population distribution, it does not explicitly reference physical geography.

Option 3: Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes.
This option presents the idea that majority of people live in mountainous areas due to the development of techniques to grow food on slopes. While it acknowledges the role of physical geography (mountainous regions) in shaping population distribution, it does not accurately represent the global distribution of people.

Option 4: Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
This option suggests that most people live in the midlatitudes, which are areas between the tropics and the polar regions, because the climate in these regions is favorable for agriculture. This option acknowledges the impact of physical geography (climate) on population distribution, specifically relating to agricultural suitability.

Considering the given options, option 4, "Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture," is the one that best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution. It recognizes the favorable conditions for agriculture in the midlatitudes, which has historically attracted and supported larger populations.