Analyze the following scenario. Which of the following statements is true?
“In the past year, the U.S. Government has rolled back previous immigration
restrictions. Changes include making immigration benefits easier to access,
updating the asylum system, and incorporating a pathway to legalization for
illegal immigrants.”
A. All three changes are obstacles for migration.
B. All three changes are opportunities for migration.
C. Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
D. Two of the changes are obstacles for migration; one is an opportunity.
C. Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
Based on the given scenario, we can analyze the statements to determine which one is true.
The scenario states that the U.S. Government has rolled back previous immigration restrictions and made changes that include the following:
1. Making immigration benefits easier to access.
2. Updating the asylum system.
3. Incorporating a pathway to legalization for illegal immigrants.
Statement A suggests that all three changes are obstacles for migration. This statement is not accurate since the changes mentioned in the scenario aim to improve or facilitate the immigration process.
Statement B suggests that all three changes are opportunities for migration. This statement is also not accurate since not all changes mentioned necessarily create opportunities for migration. Some changes may aim to address or streamline existing immigration processes rather than directly creating opportunities for migration.
Statement C suggests that two changes are opportunities, while one change is a challenge for migration. This statement captures the complexity of the scenario and accurately represents the different types of changes mentioned. It recognizes that some changes may create opportunities, while others may pose challenges.
Statement D suggests that two of the changes are obstacles for migration, and one is an opportunity. This statement is not accurate since all three changes mentioned in the scenario are intended to improve the immigration system and provide benefits or opportunities for migrants. Thus, none of the changes can be strictly classified as obstacles.
Therefore, the correct statement is C: Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
To analyze the scenario and determine which statement is true, we can break it down and evaluate each part separately.
Statement 1: "In the past year, the U.S. Government has rolled back previous immigration restrictions." This statement suggests that the U.S. Government has removed or lessened some of the barriers that were in place for immigration.
Statement 2: "Changes include making immigration benefits easier to access." This statement implies that the U.S. Government has implemented measures to simplify the process of obtaining immigration benefits.
Statement 3: "Updating the asylum system." This statement indicates that the U.S. Government has made revisions to the asylum system, although it does not provide specific details on the nature of those changes.
Statement 4: "Incorporating a pathway to legalization for illegal immigrants." This statement suggests that the U.S. Government has introduced a process by which illegal immigrants can potentially achieve legal status.
Now let's evaluate each of the options:
Option A: "All three changes are obstacles for migration." This statement is not supported by the scenario. The scenario mentions that the changes involve rolling back immigration restrictions, making immigration benefits easier to access, and introducing a pathway to legalization. None of these changes suggest obstacles for migration.
Option B: "All three changes are opportunities for migration." This statement is partially supported by the scenario. The changes mentioned in the scenario, such as rolling back restrictions and making immigration benefits easier to access, can be seen as opportunities for migration. However, the scenario does not provide enough information to determine if updating the asylum system is also an opportunity or not.
Option C: "Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration." This statement is a possibility but not explicitly stated in the scenario. It suggests that two of the changes present opportunities for migration, while one change poses a challenge. Without more specific information, this statement cannot be confirmed or refuted.
Option D: "Two of the changes are obstacles for migration; one is an opportunity." This statement is not supported by the scenario. The scenario highlights changes that involve rolling back restrictions, making immigration benefits easier to access, and introducing a pathway to legalization. These changes suggest opportunities for migration rather than obstacles.
Given the information provided in the scenario and the evaluation of the options, the most accurate answer is likely Option B: "All three changes are opportunities for migration." However, it's important to note that without more specific information on the changes to the asylum system, we cannot definitively conclude that all three changes are opportunities for migration.