Which of the following statements shows one way historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara’s actions on the Mexican War for Independence?(1 point) Responses He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina. He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina. Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina. Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina. By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence. By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence. His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence.

Question

Which of the following statements shows one way historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara’s actions on the Mexican War for Independence?(1 point) Responses He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina. He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina. Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina. Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina. By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence. By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence. His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence.

Answer 1

His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence.

Answer 2

The statement that shows one way historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions on the Mexican War for Independence is:

"His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence."

Answer 3

The statement that shows one way historians would assess the effect of José Gutiérrez de Lara's actions on the Mexican War for Independence is: "He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina."

To understand why this statement is chosen, we need to analyze the other statements and evaluate their historical impact:

1) "Divisions between him and other Texas leaders caused rebels to lose the Battle of Medina." This statement suggests that divisions between José Gutiérrez de Lara and other Texas leaders resulted in a loss at the Battle of Medina. However, it does not provide any evidence or assessment of his overall impact on Mexican independence.

2) "By acting as a spy for Spain, he destroyed attempts for Mexican independence." This statement implies that José Gutiérrez de Lara worked against Mexican independence by acting as a spy for Spain. However, there is no historical evidence to support this claim, and it goes against the general understanding of his role in the Mexican War for Independence.

3) "His heroism and leadership were a turning point for Mexican independence." This statement suggests that José Gutiérrez de Lara's heroism and leadership were significant in achieving Mexican independence. While this statement acknowledges his importance, it does not specifically mention his role in unifying rebels or winning the Battle of Medina.

Therefore, the most accurate statement that historians would likely choose is the first one: "He successfully unified rebels against Spain and helped win the Battle of Medina." This statement highlights José Gutiérrez de Lara's crucial role in unifying rebel forces and contributing to a victory. It directly links his actions to the Mexican War for Independence, making it the most compelling assessment among the given options.