The Navajo are an indigenous group of people who live in the Southwestern United States. Explain how a book about the Navajo written by a historian would be different than an autobiography written by a person who is Navajo. Use details to support your answer. Write 1-2 sentences. Hint: Your answer should explain which piece of written work would be subjective versus objective.
A book about the Navajo written by a historian would be different from an autobiography written by a Navajo person because the historian's work would be objective, based on research and supporting evidence, while the autobiography would be subjective, providing the personal experiences and perspective of the Navajo individual.
A book about the Navajo written by a historian would be more objective as it would provide a broad overview of the Navajo history, culture, and interactions with other groups, based on research and factual evidence. On the other hand, an autobiography written by a Navajo person would be more subjective as it would reflect their personal experiences, emotions, and perspectives on being Navajo.
A book about the Navajo written by a historian would be different from an autobiography written by a Navajo person because the historian would approach the subject from an objective standpoint, focusing on factual information, historical context, and external perspectives, whereas the autobiography would provide a subjective account, narrated from the personal experiences and viewpoints of a Navajo individual.
