Which statement is a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs?
a. Everyone else I know lives in a town with a leash law.
b. Leashes dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans.
c. Some leashes are pretty and can display an owner’s personality.
d. I am afraid of dogs and do not like seeing them in the park.
b. Leashes dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans.
The sound reason to support a leash law for dogs is option b: Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans.
The correct answer is option b. "Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans." This statement provides a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs because it highlights the benefit of preventing dogs from approaching or bothering other animals and people.
To arrive at this answer, it is important to evaluate the reasoning behind each statement and determine which one provides a rational and logical justification for a leash law.
- Option a: "Everyone else I know lives in a town with a leash law." This statement is based on personal opinion and the actions of others, which does not necessarily provide a strong reason for implementing a leash law.
- Option b: "Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans." This statement offers a valid benefit of having a leash law, as it promotes safety and prevents potential conflicts between dogs and humans or other dogs.
- Option c: "Some leashes are pretty and can display an owner’s personality." Though aesthetics and personal expression are important, this reasoning does not directly address the need for a leash law.
- Option d: "I am afraid of dogs and do not like seeing them in the park." While personal fears and preferences are valid, this statement does not provide a sound reason for implementing a leash law.
Therefore, option b provides the most logical and reasonable justification for supporting a leash law for dogs.