Why might an attorney utilize peremptory challenges?(1 point)
Responses
to remove a potential juror based on gender
to remove a potential juror based on gender
to remove a potential juror based on race
to remove a potential juror based on race
to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias
to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias
to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community
to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community
An attorney might utilize peremptory challenges for several reasons, including the following:
1. To remove a potential juror based on gender.
2. To remove a potential juror based on race.
3. To remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias.
4. To remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community.
An attorney may utilize peremptory challenges for several reasons. Peremptory challenges are a tool that allows attorneys to remove potential jurors from the jury pool without having to provide a specific reason or justification. The purpose of peremptory challenges is to help both sides in a trial select a jury that they believe will be fair and impartial.
One reason why an attorney may use a peremptory challenge is to remove a potential juror based on their gender. This might occur if the attorney believes that the juror's gender could potentially affect their ability to be impartial or if they believe that the juror may have personal biases related to the gender of the parties involved in the case.
Similarly, an attorney may utilize a peremptory challenge to remove a potential juror based on their race. Again, this may be because the attorney believes that the juror's race could influence their ability to be impartial or if the attorney suspects that the juror may have racial biases that could impact the outcome of the trial. It is important to note that using peremptory challenges to remove potential jurors solely based on their gender or race is generally considered discriminatory and is subject to legal restrictions.
Another valid reason for utilizing a peremptory challenge is to remove a potential juror who exhibits prejudice or bias. If an attorney believes that a juror has demonstrated clear prejudice or bias during the jury selection process, they may exercise a peremptory challenge to remove that juror from the pool. This is done to ensure that the jury is composed of individuals who are able to judge the case fairly and without any preconceived notions.
Lastly, an attorney may use a peremptory challenge to remove a potential juror based on their residence in the community. This could be because the attorney believes that the juror's close ties to the community or personal relationships with individuals involved in the case could potentially undermine their ability to be impartial.
It is important to note that the specific rules and limitations regarding the use of peremptory challenges vary by jurisdiction. Additionally, there are legal and ethical considerations that attorneys must adhere to when exercising these challenges.