Which statement best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking?(1 point) Responses The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region. The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region. The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin American. The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin American. U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S. U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S. U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America.

The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region

The statement that best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking is: "The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region."

The statement that best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking is: "The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region."

To arrive at this answer, we need to analyze each statement and determine which one aligns most closely with the goal of peacemaking in the context of U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean.

The first statement suggests that the U.S. aims to provide stability and peace in an unstable region. This aligns with the idea of peacemaking, as it implies efforts to create a peaceful environment in an area that is experiencing instability.

The second statement repeats the same idea, and therefore is redundant.

The third statement, "The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin America," does not focus on peacemaking as its main objective. Instead, it suggests intentions to establish the U.S. as an imperial government, which implies control rather than peace.

The fourth statement, "U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S," suggests a focus on establishing peace within the U.S., rather than in the Caribbean region. It does not directly address the goal of peacemaking in the unstable Caribbean.

The fifth statement, "U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America," focuses on protecting U.S. citizens and combatting threats, rather than actively seeking peace.

In conclusion, the statement that best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking is the first statement: "The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region."