What evidence supports the following statement, “A theocracy is an example of an unlimited government”?(1 point)
Responses
The people in a theocracy implement a written constitution that creates the leader’s governmental guidelines.
The people in a theocracy implement a written constitution that creates the leader’s governmental guidelines.
The people in a theocracy believe that the leader is like a god and should have total authority.
The people in a theocracy believe that the leader is like a god and should have total authority.
The people in a theocracy meet together to make group decisions for the common good.
The people in a theocracy meet together to make group decisions for the common good.
The people in a theocracy elect representatives that speak on their behalf and follow the guidance of the people.
None of the options provided support the statement that "A theocracy is an example of an unlimited government." The first three options describe characteristics of a theocracy but do not provide evidence of unlimited government. The fourth option suggests a form of representative government, contradicting the notion of unlimited government.
The statement that "A theocracy is an example of an unlimited government" is supported by the following evidence:
1. The people in a theocracy believe that the leader is like a god and should have total authority. This suggests that there are no limitations or checks on the leader's power, making it an unlimited government.
2. The people in a theocracy implement a written constitution that creates the leader's governmental guidelines. This implies that the leader's authority is derived from religious principles and not from a system of checks and balances, reinforcing the idea of an unlimited government.
In contrast, the following evidence does not support the statement:
3. The people in a theocracy meet together to make group decisions for the common good. This suggests that decision-making involves collective participation and consideration of the common good, which contradicts the idea of an unlimited government.
4. The people in a theocracy elect representatives that speak on their behalf and follow the guidance of the people. This indicates that power is delegated to representatives who are accountable to the people, implying some level of limitations on the government's authority.
Therefore, evidence 1 and 2 support the statement that a theocracy is an example of an unlimited government.
The evidence that supports the statement "A theocracy is an example of an unlimited government" is:
1. The people in a theocracy implement a written constitution that creates the leader's governmental guidelines.
In a theocracy, the leader often derives their authority from religious beliefs and the divine, rather than from a constitution or set of laws created by the people. This means that the leader's power is not limited by the constraints of a constitution or any legal framework established by the people. Instead, the leader's authority is derived directly from religious beliefs and can be considered unlimited.
2. The people in a theocracy believe that the leader is like a god and should have total authority.
In a theocracy, the leader is often viewed as a divine figure or representative of the divine. This belief that the leader is like a god implies that they should have total authority and control over the government and the people. This belief in the leader's divinity can lead to a lack of checks and balances on their power, reinforcing the notion that theocracy is an example of an unlimited government.
Based on this evidence, it can be concluded that a theocracy is indeed an example of an unlimited government.