"Nothing does not create nothing. Funny, there was never nothing in the first place. Nothing cannot exist because it doesn't. The concept of Nothing is unfathomable to Humankind, and I would even assume it is unfathomable to a Higher Power such as God or what have you.
There cannot be anything beyond something. When you try to imagine nothing you might see a white space or a black space as your first thought, that is still something.
Which is why I do not believe the Universe started at a specific time, I do not believe the Universe to be finite and I do believe in the unnatural because Nothing can exist therefore Everything can."
Explain how this persons argument might be the only truth Scientists and Philosophers can fathom of the Beginning of the Universe and how it works.
The argument presented in this statement challenges the conventional understanding of the beginning of the universe and its workings. It suggests that the concept of nothingness is unfathomable to humans and perhaps even to a higher power like God. According to this perspective, the absence of anything, or complete nothingness, cannot exist because even when we try to imagine it, we are still picturing something (like a white or black space).
This viewpoint rejects the idea that the universe had a specific starting point or that it is finite. It also suggests that the existence of something (everything) is possible because nothing can exist.
From a scientific standpoint, this argument delves into the nature of infinity, the possibility of an eternal universe, and the concept of nothingness. It challenges scientists to question whether they can truly comprehend the state of nothingness or even define it within the framework of their theories.
From a philosophical perspective, this argument raises questions about the nature of existence, the limitations of human understanding, and the possibility of something emerging from nothing. It challenges philosophers to explore alternative explanations and consider the constraints of human perception when contemplating the origin and functioning of the universe.
While this argument presents an unconventional viewpoint, it highlights the limitations of human comprehension and encourages scientists and philosophers to think beyond traditional explanations. It invites them to entertain the idea that the universe may operate in a manner that goes beyond the scope of current understanding.
The argument presented by the person suggests that the concept of "nothing" is unfathomable and that it cannot exist. They contend that there was never nothing in the first place and that nothingness cannot be imagined because even the perceived absence of something, such as a white or black space, is still considered something.
This perspective challenges the notion of a specific beginning of the universe and proposes that the universe is not finite. It suggests that the universe has always existed and that the existence of everything is not limited by the absence of nothingness.
From a scientific and philosophical standpoint, this argument aligns with certain interpretations of cosmology and metaphysics. In scientific terms, the concept of a singular "Big Bang" or a specific starting point is widely accepted but does have limitations. Some models, such as the cyclic or eternal inflation models, propose a cyclical nature of the universe, where it expands and contracts repeatedly over time without a definitive beginning. These models support the idea that the universe does not have a specific starting point in time.
Philosophically, this argument resonates with certain schools of thought, such as eternalism or acausality. These views propose that time is a dimension that stretches infinitely in both directions and that the universe has always existed in some form. They challenge the notion of a linear progression of time and a singular origin event.
However, it is important to note that this argument is just one perspective among many. Scientists and philosophers explore various theories and interpretations regarding the origin and nature of the universe. There are alternative viewpoints, such as the Big Bang theory, multiverse theory, or religious explanations, that offer different explanations. The quest for understanding the beginning of the universe is an ongoing pursuit, and no single perspective can be considered as the ultimate truth.
The argument presented suggests that the concept of "nothing" is unfathomable to humankind, and possibly even to a higher power such as God. It states that "nothing" cannot exist because it simply doesn't, and that when we try to imagine nothing, we still end up with something, whether it be a white or black space. Based on this perspective, the person argues that the universe did not start at a specific time, it is not finite, and they believe in the existence of the unnatural, as nothing can exist, therefore everything can.
This argument aligns with certain scientific and philosophical theories that explore the concept of the beginning of the universe. Within the field of cosmology, for example, scientists and philosophers have proposed different theories about the origins of the universe, such as the Big Bang theory or theories of eternal inflation.
One interpretation of the argument can be related to the concept of "ex nihilo," which refers to creation out of nothing. From a scientific perspective, the Big Bang theory argues that the universe started from an extremely dense and hot state, often referred to as a singularity. However, the concept of a singularity is still not well understood, and it is difficult to imagine true nothingness before the universe came into existence. In this sense, the argument suggests that the existence of "nothing" as an absolute state might not be possible to comprehend or explain.
Furthermore, the argument raises the question of whether the universe is finite or infinite. Scientists and philosophers have debated this topic for centuries. Some theories, like the model of eternal inflation, propose that the universe is infinite and continually expanding, possibly giving rise to multiple universes. This aligns with the belief expressed in the argument that the universe is not finite.
It is important to note, however, that while the argument provides an intriguing perspective on the nature of the universe's beginning and its potential infiniteness, it remains a philosophical viewpoint. Scientists continue to explore and develop theories based on empirical evidence and mathematical models to better understand the origins and workings of the universe, and multiple perspectives and theories coexist within the scientific community.