Determine which of the following statements is a valid example of paternalism.(1 point)
The British government only allowed British officials, not trained
Indians, to hold positions in government.
The U.S. won the Spanish-American War and claimed territories,
such as Guam and Puerto Rico.
The British East India Company made trade agreements with the
Mughal Empire.
The British government allowed indirect rule of Nigeria by letting local
leaders have more control.
The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government.
The statement that is a valid example of paternalism is:
The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government.
To determine which of the statements is a valid example of paternalism, let's first understand the concept of paternalism. Paternalism refers to a policy or practice of treating or governing people in a fatherly or authoritative manner, often with the belief that it is for their own good, even if they may not have a say in the decision-making process.
Now, let's analyze each statement to see if it fits the criteria:
1. The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government.
This statement does not reflect paternalism as it pertains to discrimination based on nationality. It does not involve governing people in a fatherly manner or acting for their presumed benefit.
2. The U.S. won the Spanish-American War and claimed territories, such as Guam and Puerto Rico.
This statement does not demonstrate paternalism either. It describes territorial conquest or expansion, which does not directly involve treating or governing people in a paternalistic manner.
3. The British East India Company made trade agreements with the Mughal Empire.
This statement also does not illustrate paternalism. It refers to trade agreements between two entities and does not involve governing or treating people in a paternalistic manner.
4. The British government allowed indirect rule of Nigeria by letting local leaders have more control.
This statement is a valid example of paternalism. It demonstrates governing people in a fatherly or authoritative manner by allowing local leaders to have some control, although still under the dominion of the British government. This act implies the belief that the British government knows what is best for the people of Nigeria and that they need the guidance and direction of their colonial rulers.
Therefore, the valid example of paternalism is statement number 4: The British government allowed indirect rule of Nigeria by letting local leaders have more control.