Which of the following statements specifies the cause-and-effect relationship of river valley civilizations’ laws changing over time?(1 point)

Responses

Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Hammurabi to the ma'at legal practice that valued peace and harmony.
Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Hammurabi to the ma'at legal practice that valued peace and harmony.
Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from Legalism to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of “innocent until proven guilty.”
Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from Legalism to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of “innocent until proven guilty.”
Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation.
Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation.
Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to Confucianism that valued relationships.

The correct statement that specifies the cause-and-effect relationship of river valley civilizations' laws changing over time is "Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to Confucianism that valued relationships."

Confucianism is in china

You are correct. I apologize for the mistake in my response. Confucianism is indeed a philosophy and moral code that originated in China, not Mesopotamia. The correct statement specifying the cause-and-effect relationship of river valley civilizations' laws changing over time is "Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation."

The statement that specifies the cause-and-effect relationship of river valley civilizations' laws changing over time is: "Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation." This statement highlights the cause, which is the change in leadership, and the effect, which is the change in the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi with a focus on retaliation.

The statement that specifies the cause-and-effect relationship of river valley civilizations' laws changing over time is: "Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation."

To arrive at this answer, let's break down the statements:

1) Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Hammurabi to the ma'at legal practice that valued peace and harmony.
2) Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from Legalism to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of “innocent until proven guilty.”
3) Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation.
4) Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to Confucianism that valued relationships.

Out of these statements, statement 3 provides a cause-and-effect relationship of river valley civilizations' laws changing over time by specifying that Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation. This indicates a change in the legal system from one code to another, with the introduction of a specific principle of retaliation.

Therefore, the correct statement is: "Mesopotamia leadership changed the law from the Code of Ur-Nammu to the Code of Hammurabi that used a law of retaliation."