Why did Congress aside the election of 1800?select all that apply. Based on the outcome it was mandated by the US Constitution, the popular vote was a tie, no candidates won the electoral vote, or
not enough Citizens voted to determine the outcome
Based on the given options, none of them apply to the reason why Congress decided the election of 1800. The correct answer is: None of the above.
In the election of 1800, no candidate had a majority of electoral votes because there was a tie between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr. The outcome was determined by the House of Representatives, as mandated by the Constitution. The House ultimately elected Thomas Jefferson as the President.
The reasons why Congress set aside the election of 1800 are as follows:
1. No candidates won the electoral vote.
2. Based on the outcome, it was mandated by the US Constitution.
To determine why Congress set aside the election of 1800, we need to analyze the options given:
1. Based on the outcome, it was mandated by the US Constitution: This option is not accurate. The US Constitution does not mandate setting aside an election based solely on the outcome of an election.
2. The popular vote was a tie: This option is also not accurate. While the popular vote may have been close, it being a tie is not the reason Congress set aside the election.
3. No candidates won the electoral vote: This is the correct answer. In the election of 1800, neither Thomas Jefferson nor Aaron Burr won a majority of electoral votes. Both candidates from the Democratic-Republican Party had an equal number of electoral votes, causing a deadlock.
4. Not enough citizens voted to determine the outcome: This option is not accurate. The number of citizens voting does not determine whether an election is set aside or not. It is the allocation of electoral votes that is crucial.
Therefore, the correct answer is that Congress set aside the election of 1800 because no candidates won the electoral vote.