The history of the present king of great britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states to prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world
Which conclusion form the declaration of independence is best supported by the reasoning in thee sentences.
governments exist to protect the people who created them
people should publicly declare their greivances before taking a drastic action
governments should no be overthrown for light and trivial reasons
all people are born with basic rights that cannot be taken away
The conclusion that is best supported by the reasoning in the sentences is: all people are born with basic rights that cannot be taken away.
This conclusion is supported by the statement that the history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, which implies that the king has violated the basic rights of the people. The statement also suggests that these rights are inherent and cannot be taken away, emphasizing the importance of protecting and preserving them.
The conclusion from the Declaration of Independence that is best supported by the reasoning in the provided sentences is: governments exist to protect the people who created them.
The statement "The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states " implies that the government (in this case, the king) has failed in its purpose and duty to protect the people. Therefore, it supports the conclusion that governments exist to protect the people who created them.
The conclusion from the Declaration of Independence that is best supported by the reasoning in these sentences is: "Governments exist to protect the people who created them."
Explanation:
The provided sentences from the Declaration of Independence express dissatisfaction with the actions of the present king of Great Britain. They argue that the king's actions demonstrate a desire to establish an absolute tyranny over the states. By stating, "to prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world," the authors of the document emphasize the importance of presenting evidence to support their claims.
When considering the conclusion that is best supported by this reasoning, we can eliminate some options. The sentence does not address the importance of publicly declaring grievances before taking drastic action or the notion that governments should not be overthrown for light and trivial reasons. Instead, it focuses on the purpose of governments, asserting that they exist to protect the people who created them. This conclusion aligns with the authors' perception of the present king's actions as repeated injuries and usurpations, which infringe upon the rights and well-being of the people.