Bad I da game discorvery of a route of India by sea proved to be
1. The only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route
2. Far too costly to be sailed on a regular basis
3. Very profitable
4. Much longer than the route to India by land
It seems like you have provided some statements about the discovery of a sea route to India. Based on these statements:
1. The first statement suggests that the discovery of the sea route to India by the Portuguese was a unique event. It implies that no other Portuguese vessel ever sailed this route.
2. The second statement states that the cost of sailing the sea route to India was too high to do it regularly. This implies that it was expensive to maintain or navigate this route frequently.
3. The third statement suggests that the sea route to India was very profitable. This implies that it brought significant economic benefits to the Portuguese, likely through trade or other commercial activities.
4. The final statement suggests that the sea route to India was longer than the land route. This implies that it took more time to reach India by sea compared to traveling overland.
Overall, these statements highlight different aspects of the discovery of the sea route to India, from its rarity and costs to its profitability and length compared to the land route.
So ai what’s the answer to his question
Based on the information provided, the answer to the question "Bad I da game discorvery of a route of India by sea proved to be" would be:
The discovery of a sea route to India proved to be:
1. The only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route.
2. Far too costly to be sailed on a regular basis.
3. Very profitable.
4. Much longer than the route to India by land.
The discovery of a sea route to India by the Portuguese had several implications:
1. The first implication is that it was the only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route. This means that the Portuguese successfully found a new maritime path to India that had not been previously explored.
2. The second implication is that this route was deemed too costly to be sailed on a regular basis. This suggests that the expenses associated with establishing and maintaining the sea route were significant, making it financially impractical to use regularly.
3. The third implication is that despite the costs, the sea route to India was very profitable. This implies that the benefits derived from trading with India, such as valuable goods and spices, outweighed the expenses incurred in establishing and operating the route.
4. Finally, it is worth noting that the sea route to India was much longer than the route by land. This suggests that although the sea route provided access to lucrative trade opportunities, it required more time and resources compared to the overland route to India.
To determine the correctness of these statements, we need to analyze the historical context of the discovery of the sea route to India by the Portuguese.
1. The statement that the discovery of the sea route to India was the only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route is incorrect. The Portuguese were not the first to discover this route. It was Vasco da Gama, a Portuguese explorer, who successfully sailed from Europe to India in 1498, opening up a direct sea route. However, prior to da Gama's expedition, there were other Portuguese explorers who attempted and failed to reach India by sea. So, it was not the first or only attempt made by the Portuguese.
2. The statement that the sea route to India by sea was far too costly to be sailed on a regular basis is partially correct. Initially, the cost of setting up and maintaining the sea route was indeed high due to various factors such as the need for advanced navigational equipment, ships, crew, provisions, and the risk of encountering hostile forces. However, over time, as trade and navigation improved, costs reduced, and the route became more economically viable.
3. The statement that the sea route to India by sea was very profitable is correct. The discovery of this sea route revolutionized global trade, boosting the economy of Portugal significantly. The direct sea route bypassed the intermediary Arab traders who controlled the overland silk and spice trade, allowing the Portuguese to establish direct trade links with India. This led to substantial profits, as they could directly access valuable Indian goods, such as spices, silk, and precious stones.
4. The statement that the sea route to India by sea was much longer than the route to India by land is correct. Until the sea route was discovered, the predominant trade route to India from Europe was overland, which involved long and arduous journeys through various regions, such as the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Indian subcontinent. The sea route significantly reduced the time and effort required by providing a direct passage through the oceans, thereby making the journey considerably shorter.
In conclusion, statements 1, 2, 3, and 4 can be evaluated as follows:
- Statement 1 is incorrect as the sea route was not the only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route.
- Statement 2 is partially correct as the route was initially costly but later became economically viable.
- Statement 3 is correct as the sea route to India by sea proved to be profitable for Portugal.
- Statement 4 is correct as the sea route to India was shorter than the overland route.