Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic?(1 point) Responses A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.
A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.
Which of the following represents Madison’s views on factions?(1 point) Responses Factions can best be controlled through direct democracy. Factions can best be controlled through direct democracy. Factions can best be controlled by having a large republic. Factions can best be controlled by having a large republic. Factions can best be controlled by direct citizen participation in policy making. Factions can best be controlled by direct citizen participation in policy making. Factions can best be controlled by remaining as 13 separate countries.
Factions can best be controlled by having a large republic.
Which of the following is an accurate critique of presidential systems of government?(1 point) Responses Presidential systems of government are undemocratic because the legislature selects the head of the executive branch. Presidential systems of government are undemocratic because the legislature selects the head of the executive branch. In presidential systems of government, there is no way for the court system to stop an action of the president. In presidential systems of government, there is no way for the court system to stop an action of the president. Presidential systems of government are more likely to lead to divided government. Presidential systems of government are more likely to lead to divided government. Presidential systems of government are more likely to result in a high concentration of power in a single branch.
Presidential systems of government are more likely to result in a high concentration of power in a single branch.
The logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic is that a single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.
Based on the options provided, it appears that the Anti-Federalists believed that a single large republic would make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. To understand the logic used by the Anti-Federalists, one would need to study the arguments put forth by this group during the debates over the ratification of the United States Constitution.
To get a comprehensive understanding of the Anti-Federalist perspective, you can read primary documents from that time period, such as the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers. These papers include essays written by prominent figures on both sides of the argument, providing insights into their concerns and reasoning.
Additionally, reading secondary sources like historical analyses and academic articles can help shed light on the overarching arguments and positions of the Anti-Federalists. These sources may delve into the fears of an over-centralized government, the importance of local representation, and the potential for abuses of power in a large republic.
By exploring these primary and secondary sources, you can gain a more in-depth understanding of the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic.