Which of the following would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the
Philippines?(1 point)
an imperialist
National Association of Manufacturers
Sixto López
William McKinley
an imperialist
Sixto López would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines.
To determine which of the following would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines, we can examine the characteristics and viewpoints of each option.
1. An imperialist: An imperialist, by definition, would support the expansion and acquisition of new territories. Therefore, an imperialist would not construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines.
2. National Association of Manufacturers: The National Association of Manufacturers is an American trade association that represents manufacturing industries. While this group's viewpoint may vary depending on the specific context and interests of its members, it is unlikely to have a direct stance on U.S. annexation of the Philippines.
3. Sixto López: Without further information, it's difficult to determine who Sixto López is and their stance on U.S. annexation of the Philippines. As a result, we are unable to make a conclusive judgment about their position.
4. William McKinley: William McKinley was the President of the United States during the Spanish-American War and the subsequent decision to annex the Philippines. While McKinley ultimately supported annexation, he initially had reservations and struggled with his decision. Therefore, based on historical context, it is possible to construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines from McKinley's early deliberations.
In conclusion, the option that would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines is William McKinley, based on his initial hesitation and internal conflict over the decision.