What is a reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects
A. it only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase.
B. It only applied to the lands of Mexican Cession.
C. It relied on popular sovereignty.
D. It limited the number of states that could be admitted per year.
C. It relied on popular sovereignty.
The reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is:
A. it only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an agreement reached between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States Congress. It aimed to maintain the balance between free states and slave states by admitting Missouri (a slave state) and Maine (a free state) into the Union at the same time. Additionally, it established a line, known as the 36°30' parallel, indicating that any new states north of that line would be free states and any south of it would be slave states.
However, the Missouri Compromise only applied specifically to the lands acquired through the Louisiana Purchase, which was a sizable territorial acquisition made by the United States in 1803. It did not address the issue of slavery in other territories, such as the lands acquired through the Mexican Cession.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer to why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects.
The reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is option A - it only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase.
To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the Missouri Compromise and its limitations. The Missouri Compromise was a legislation passed by the United States Congress in 1820 to address the issue of slavery expansion in the new territories. It stated that slavery would be prohibited in the northern part of the Louisiana Purchase (the lands above the 36°30' latitude line), except in the state of Missouri, which was admitted as a slave state.
Option B is incorrect because the Missouri Compromise did not apply to the lands of the Mexican Cession. This territory was acquired by the United States after the Mexican-American War in 1848, which occurred after the Missouri Compromise was already in place. Therefore, the Missouri Compromise did not have any jurisdiction over these lands.
Option C is incorrect because popular sovereignty, the idea that the residents of a territory should decide for themselves whether to allow slavery, was part of the Compromise of 1850, not the Missouri Compromise.
Option D is incorrect because the Missouri Compromise did not limit the number of states that could be admitted per year. The provision related to the number of states was part of the Compromise of 1850 and the subsequent Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, not the Missouri Compromise.
Thus, the correct answer is A - the Missouri Compromise only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase.