Eastman Kodak could sell the Brownie for very little because it knew it could make money on film and photo processing. what would be the best equivalent to this in today's society?
cars that require gas and maintenance
inexspensive printers and costly ink cartridges
food services with additional cost for takeout
sports clothes that are matching jackets and jeans
The best equivalent to Eastman Kodak's strategy today could be the model employed by smartphone manufacturers. These companies often initially sell their smartphones at relatively low prices or even at a loss, expecting to make significant profits from app purchases, subscriptions, and software services. Similarly to Eastman Kodak's approach, these manufacturers focus on making money from complementary products and services rather than relying solely on the upfront sale of their hardware.
so can you tell me the answer from the options
what type of photographer was margaret bourke-white
civil war
portrait
landscape
documentary
Margaret Bourke-White was primarily known as a documentary photographer. She specialized in capturing images of industrial and architectural subjects, along with documentary photojournalism. She covered various significant events and locations, such as the Great Depression, World War II, and the Soviet Union during the early 20th century. While she may have also taken portraits and landscape photographs, her reputation mainly stems from her documentary photography work.
why is photography important for historians
it reveals all kinds of details about the era
it requires that they have photography skills
it help them if pictures were taken for historical records
Photographs are usually accompanied by written documents
Photography is important for historians for several reasons:
1. Revealing details about the era: Photographs provide visual evidence of historical events, people, places, and objects. They offer a unique perspective and can capture moments that might not be described in written documents. Photographs can reveal details about clothing, architecture, technology, social interactions, and cultural practices, providing a more comprehensive understanding of a particular era.
2. Documenting historical records: Photographs serve as historical records themselves. They can provide insight into the physical appearance of individuals, locations, or objects at a specific point in time. These visual records often complement written documents, enhancing the overall understanding and interpretation of historical events.
3. Assisting historical research: Photographs can serve as primary sources for historical research. They can be analyzed, interpreted, and compared to other sources to gain deeper insights into historical contexts. Photographs can also help validate or challenge existing historical narratives, providing a more nuanced understanding of the past.
4. Visual representation: Photographs have the power to evoke emotions and create connections with the past. They can make historical events more relatable and tangible for audiences. Visual representations often have a lasting impact, helping to engage and educate people about history.
It's important to note that while photography skills are not a requirement for historians, an understanding of photographic analysis and interpretation is valuable in utilizing photographs effectively as historical sources.
so can you choose from the options
The option that best explains why photography is important for historians is: "It helps them if pictures were taken for historical records." Photographs taken as historical records provide visual evidence and documentation of events, people, and places, offering a unique perspective and enhancing our understanding of the past.
The best modern-day equivalent to Eastman Kodak's business model would be the printer industry, specifically the sale of inexpensive printers and costly ink cartridges.
In the case of Kodak, they sold the Brownie camera at a low price because they knew they could generate profit from the sale of film and photo processing. In other words, they used a "razor and blades" model, where the initial product (the razor or camera) is sold at a low cost or sometimes even given away for free, but the ongoing use of consumables (the blades or film/processing) generates a steady stream of revenue.
Similarly, many printer manufacturers offer affordable printers, but they make most of their profit from selling ink cartridges at relatively high prices. This business strategy benefits the company because customers often need to continuously purchase ink cartridges as they run out, ensuring a consistent revenue stream. The upfront cost of the printer may be relatively low or even heavily subsidized, but the long-term cost of ink cartridges can add up significantly.
This type of pricing model is also seen in other industries, such as food services charging extra for takeout orders or sports clothing brands selling matching jackets and jeans separately. However, the printer industry is perhaps the closest modern-day equivalent to Kodak's strategy of selling the Brownie at a low price while making money on the associated consumables.