Which of the following constructs an argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines?(1 point) Responses Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them. Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them. Racist ideology: White Americans’ way of life would be taken away. Racist ideology: White Americans’ way of life would be taken away. Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically. Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically. Economic reasons: Overseas possession are expensive and hard to manage. Economic reasons: Overseas possession are expensive and hard to manage.
The correct answer is:
Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically.
Which of the following would most likely construct an argument against U.S. annexation of the Philippines?(1 point) Responses Sixto López Sixto López National Association of Manufacturers National Association of Manufacturers an imperialist an imperialist William McKinley
The correct answer is: Sixto López.
The argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines can be constructed based on the following reasons:
1. Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them.
2. Racist ideology: White Americans' way of life would be taken away.
3. Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically.
4. Economic reasons: Overseas possessions are expensive and hard to manage.
Please note that providing arguments for racist ideology goes against promoting equality and inclusivity.
The construct that presents an argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines is:
Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them.
To arrive at this answer, we need to analyze each response option and identify the one that supports the U.S. annexation of the Philippines.
- The first response option, "Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them," presents a paternalistic viewpoint, suggesting that the Filipinos are not capable of governing themselves and therefore need the U.S. to take charge.
- The second response option, "Racist ideology: White Americans' way of life would be taken away," does not directly address the annexation of the Philippines and focuses on the potential impact on the way of life for White Americans, implying a racist ideology.
- The third response option, "Trade reasons: Trade with Germany would increase dramatically," highlights the potential increase in trade with Germany as a result of annexing the Philippines. This reason does not directly support U.S. annexation but rather emphasizes the economic benefits of such an action.
- The fourth response option, "Economic reasons: Overseas possession is expensive and hard to manage," suggests that overseas possessions are costly and difficult to handle. This reason does not support the idea of U.S. annexation of the Philippines but rather presents a potential drawback.
Given this analysis, the construct that aligns with the argument in favor of U.S. annexation of the Philippines is the first response option: "Paternalism: Filipinos are unfit to rule, and the U.S. has a duty to manage them."