Which would be considered a reliable source?(1 point)
Responses
a blog written by an anonymous author
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
an article from a scientific journal
a biology textbook from 1920
An article from a scientific journal.
Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
Which question can be used to evaluate reliability of a source?(1 point)
Responses
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
"Is the author American?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
Validity refers to(1 point)
Responses
\originality.
consistency.
\accuracy.
reliability.
Accuracy.
To corroborate information is to(1 point)
Responses
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
The reliable source among these options would be "an article from a scientific journal." To determine the reliability of a source, it is important to consider a few factors. Firstly, an article from a scientific journal undergoes a peer-review process, where experts in the relevant field evaluate the credibility and accuracy of the research before publication. This ensures that the information presented is reliable and based on scientific evidence.
On the other hand, a blog written by an anonymous author lacks accountability and transparency. While some blogs may contain accurate information, without knowing the qualifications or expertise of the author, it is difficult to assess the reliability of the content.
An opinion column in a magazine, even if it is from your favorite one, represents the subjective views and perspectives of the author. While it can provide insights or different perspectives, it may not necessarily be grounded in factual evidence or objective research.
Lastly, a biology textbook from 1920 may not be reliable today, as scientific knowledge continuously evolves and updates. It is crucial to rely on current and up-to-date information, especially in rapidly changing fields like biology.
In summary, when seeking a reliable source, it is generally best to look for information from reputable scientific journals, publications, or reputable sources that undergo a rigorous review process and provide evidence-based information.