Why did sharecropping lead to a cycle of poverty?
Responses
No one shared the tools, seed, or fertilizer needed to be successful.
No one shared the tools, seed, or fertilizer needed to be successful. - no response given
Freedmen had worked on farms all their life and didn’t want to work on farms anymore.
Freedmen had worked on farms all their life and didn’t want to work on farms anymore. - no response given
Crop prices were low, which prevented farmers from being able to pay off debts.
Crop prices were low, which prevented farmers from being able to pay off debts. - no response given
There was not enough land for everyone
There was not enough land for everyone - no response given
The cycles of poverty in sharecropping can be attributed to several factors:
1. Lack of access to resources: Sharecroppers did not have ownership or control over the tools, seeds, and fertilizers needed for farming. This meant they were dependent on the landowners for these resources, and often did not receive enough or receive them in a timely manner. Without the necessary resources, sharecroppers struggled to produce enough crops and generate sufficient income.
2. Generational dependence: Many sharecroppers were former slaves or their descendants who had little to no experience or opportunity for education or skills beyond agriculture. With limited options for employment or landownership, they remained trapped in a recurrent cycle of working on farms. The lack of diversification in their skills and income sources made it difficult for them to break out of the poverty cycle.
3. Low crop prices: Sharecroppers faced the challenge of low crop prices, which affected their ability to make a profit. Despite their hard work and efforts, the financial returns from their crops were often not enough to cover their debts or meet their basic needs. This further deepened their poverty and perpetuated the cycle.
4. Limited land availability: Many sharecropping arrangements involved multiple families or individuals farming on the same plot of land. With limited land available, sharecroppers were allocated small plots, making it difficult to produce enough crops to sustain themselves and their families. The lack of access to sufficient land perpetuated poverty and created intense competition among sharecroppers for resources and opportunities.
In combination, these factors created a system where sharecroppers remained trapped in poverty, continually struggling to make ends meet and unable to break free from the cycle.
is it C
Yes, crop prices being low and preventing farmers from being able to pay off debts is one of the reasons why sharecropping led to a cycle of poverty.
Which of the following did the Supreme Court rule in Plessy v. Ferguson?
Responses
that segregation could continue
that segregation could continue - no response given
that the actions of Ku Klux Klan members would be protected as free speech
that the actions of Ku Klux Klan members would be protected as free speech - no response given
that freed African Americans had the right to vote
that freed African Americans had the right to vote - no response given
that black codes were unconstitutional