How did the Intolerable Acts—meant to punish Massachusetts for defying Great Britain—show that the British government did not respect the rights of the colonists to rule themselves? They began forcing American colonists to drink tea instead of coffee. They prevented American colonists from publishing newspapers or printing money. They replaced a civilian government with a military dictatorship. They forced all colonists to attend town meetings.
A. by listing ways that the British government had abused the American colonies.
A. Equality before the law.
According to the Declaration of Independence, how do humans get their rights?
A. from the Bill of Rights
B. from constitutions
C. from kings
D. from the Creator
D. from the Creator. According to the Declaration of Independence, the belief is that all individuals are endowed with certain unalienable rights, and these rights are not granted by governments or documents, but rather by their Creator.
B. from the consent of the governed. The Declaration of Independence states that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, indicating that the authority and legitimacy of a government are based on the approval and support of the people it governs.
The Intolerable Acts, enacted in response to the Boston Tea Party in 1774, were meant to punish Massachusetts for defying Great Britain. These laws clearly demonstrated that the British government did not respect the rights of the colonists to rule themselves through various measures:
1. They forced American colonists to drink tea instead of coffee: The Intolerable Acts included the Tea Act, which granted a monopoly to the British East India Company over the sale of tea in the colonies. This effectively eliminated competition and forced colonists to purchase only British tea, undermining their ability to make choices in their own consumption.
2. They prevented American colonists from publishing newspapers or printing money: The Massachusetts Government Act, one of the Intolerable Acts, revoked the colony's charter and placed strict limits on self-government. It allowed the royal governor to appoint most government officials and limited town meetings, which hindered the colonists' ability to freely express themselves through newspapers or even control their own currency.
3. They replaced a civilian government with a military dictatorship: The Massachusetts Government Act also replaced the civilian government with a military dictatorship. General Thomas Gage, the British military commander, was appointed as the new governor and was granted wide-ranging powers. This removed the ability of the colonists to govern themselves and placed them under the control of a despotic military authority.
4. They forced all colonists to attend town meetings: The Administration of Justice Act, another Intolerable Act, allowed royal officials accused of crimes to be tried in England instead of the colonies. This provision not only undermined the local legal system but also required colonists to serve on juries and in effect forced them to attend town meetings related to such trials, denying them the right to choose whether or not to participate.
In summary, the Intolerable Acts showcased the British government's disregard for the colonists' rights to self-rule and self-determination by enforcing restrictions on their trade, limiting self-government, imposing military control, and compelling their participation in events against their will.
C. They replaced a civilian government with a military dictatorship.
Option C demonstrates that the British government did not respect the rights of the colonists to rule themselves. By appointing General Thomas Gage as the governor of Massachusetts and granting him extensive powers, including the ability to override civilian authority, the British government replaced the existing civilian government with a military dictatorship. This undermined the colonists' ability to govern themselves and made it clear that the British government did not consider their right to self-rule as valid.
In the Declaration of Independence, how did Thomas Jefferson make the case for American Independence?
by listing ways that the British government had abused the American colonies
by laying out the plan for self-government and how it would be achieved
by quoting Greek and Roman philosophers who believed in the rule of the aristocracy
by reminding people that other colonies had successfully broken away from their mother countries
Thomas Jefferson made the case for American Independence in the Declaration of Independence by listing ways that the British government had abused the American colonies. In the document, Jefferson outlined a detailed indictment of the British monarchy, accusing it of violating the colonists' rights, imposing unfair taxes, obstructing trade, quartering soldiers, denying fair trials, and more. This list of grievances highlighted the colonists' justification for seeking independence and served as evidence of the British government's mistreatment and disregard for their rights.
In the Declaration of Independence, how did Thomas Jefferson make the case for American Independence?
A. by listing ways that the British government had abused the American colonies
B. by laying out the plan for self-government and how it would be achieved
C. by quoting Greek and Roman philosophers who believed in the rule of the aristocracy
D. by reminding people that other colonies had successfully broken away from their mother countries