Some argue that the CRISPR/Cas9 technology is still in its early stages and its long-term effects on the human genome are not fully understood, thus it may lead to unintended consequences or unpredictable side effects. Additionally, there are concerns about the accessibility and affordability of this technology, as it may only be available to a privileged few, exacerbating social inequalities in healthcare. Lastly, there is a moral and ethical debate about whether we should be intervening in the human genetic code, as it raises questions about the potential for genetic enhancement and designer babies.
(In 1-3 complete sentences, write the counterclaims that you have against the opposing viewpoint.)