Which of the following makes a true statement about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode ?
a. The defendant plead guilty to the charges at his arraignment.
b. The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law.
c. The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode.
d. The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
Without additional information, it is not possible to determine which statement is true about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode.
yes it is
Apologies for the confusion. Based on the given options, the true statement about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode would be:
d. The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of Snoozer v. Early. What type of case was it, and what could be its outcome?
a. It was a criminal case. Felina Early faced possible jail time for failing to control her cat.
b. It was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds.
c. It was a civil case. Early was seeking compensation for the loss of her cat.
d. It was a criminal case. Snoozer faced possible jail time for lying about her neighbor.
Based on the information provided, the correct answer is:
b. It was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds.
Which of these pieces of evidence would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early?
a. Dibeast has lunch every week with Ms. Snoozer and trains her birds.
b. Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing. c.Dibeast is an animal control officer who often has to capture Ms. Snoozer’s birds.
d. Dibeast witnessed that Early’s cat was trained and well behaved.
Based on the information provided, the most important piece of evidence for the jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early would be:
b. Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing.
John and Bob are going to court. John says Bob failed to pay him for a racing bike, while Bob says John gave it to him as a gift. What type of case is this, and what are the possible verdicts?
a. This is a criminal case. The jury can rule that Bob is liable or not liable.
b. This is a civil case. The jury can rule that Bob is liable or not liable.
c. This is a civil case. The jury can rule that Bob is guilty or not guilty.
d. This is a criminal case. The jury can rule that Bob is guilty or not guilty.
The correct answer is:
b. This is a civil case. The jury can rule that Bob is liable or not liable.
To determine which statement is true about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode, we need to analyze the given information. Let's break down each statement and evaluate its validity:
a. The defendant plead guilty to the charges at his arraignment.
To find out if this statement is true, we could check the court records or transcripts from the arraignment. It's important to examine the official documentation to verify the defendant's plea.
b. The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law.
To assess the truth of this statement, we would need to review the trial proceedings or any testimonies provided by the teacher. Evidence and witness testimonies play a crucial role in determining if an individual is likely to break the law.
c. The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode.
To determine the validity of this statement, we should evaluate any police reports, evidence logs, or testimony given by the police officer involved. It's crucial to verify if there was indeed a lack of evidence against Goode.
d. The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
To assess the truthfulness of this statement, we would need to investigate any statements, witness accounts, or testimonies provided by the neighbor. It is important to gather reliable evidence to establish the credibility of this claim.
In summary, to determine which statement is true about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode, one must review the relevant court records, trial proceedings, police reports, and witness testimonies.