Miss pierce how can you be such a foolish Ignorant girl as to think you could offer to pay Mr. Higgins. The author uses a line above to show the reader. That a the flower girl is not worthy. Will be at all be the flower girl. Does not have any manners?
This line from the text reveals several characteristics about the characters and their societal context.
The author uses the line to show the reader the following:
1. Class distinctions: The flower girl, Miss Pierce, and Mr. Higgins belong to very different social classes. This is demonstrated by the speaker's outrage that Miss Pierce - presumably a common flower girl - would presume to pay Mr. Higgins - likely a man of higher social standing.
2. Ignorance: By offering to pay Mr. Higgins, Miss Pierce displays a lack of understanding of the societal rules that govern their interaction. This ignorance is highlighted by the speaker's shocked response.
3. Lack of worth: The speaker implies that not only is Miss Pierce socially inferior, but that her offer of payment is almost offensive, further suggesting she is not of much worth.
4. Manners: The speaker's harsh critique suggests that Miss Pierce's actions are not only inappropriate but also lacking in good manners. This further shows the class and societal divisions between the characters.
Therefore, the line suggests that the flower girl lacks understanding of societal norms, implies her lower social standing (a lack of worth), and reveals her inadequate manners. However, it does not necessarily mean that she will not "be at all be the flower girl" as this phrase is unclear in meaning. She may still remain a flower girl, but she may need to learn more about societal expectations and manners.