Two groups of scientists got different results while studying about the expansion of the universe. What do the two results most likely indicate? (3 points)
Group of answer choices
the ideas of both groups of scientists are invalid
all scientists do not have access to equally accurate data
there are several testable ideas to describe the origin of the universe
it is impossible to have a single acceptable theory about the universe
There are several testable ideas to describe the origin of the universe.
The two groups of scientists getting different results while studying the expansion of the universe most likely indicate:
1. All scientists do not have access to equally accurate data: The different results suggest that the scientists might be working with different sets of data or observational methods, leading to varying conclusions.
2. There are several testable ideas to describe the origin of the universe: The differing results could indicate that there are multiple valid theories or models that can be tested to explain the expansion of the universe. This suggests that there is no single universally accepted theory yet.
3. It is impossible to have a single acceptable theory about the universe: The presence of different results implies that there is still ongoing debate and uncertainty within the scientific community about the exact nature and dynamics of the universe. Thus, there may not be a single theory that can fully explain all the observed phenomena yet.