The circle graph shows the approximate percent of the total volume of each Great Lake. Display the data using another type of display. Volume of the Great Lakes: 22% Michigan, 7% Ontario, 16% Huron, 2% Erie, and 53% Superior. Write a convincing argument telling which display is more appropriate.
One possible way to display the data is through a bar chart or horizontal bar chart. This would involve a horizontal axis showing the different lakes and a vertical axis showing the percentage of volume. The bars would represent the different percentages and could be color-coded to match the original circle graph to aid comparison. An advantage of this display is that it would allow the viewer to easily compare the volumes of the different lakes and see how much larger Superior is compared to the others. It would also enable easier and more precise comparisons between them, as it is sometimes difficult to gauge proportions accurately using a circle graph, especially if the segments are small or numerous.
In conclusion, the bar chart or horizontal bar chart is more appropriate for displaying the Great Lakes volume data than the original circle graph. While the circle graph may be visually appealing and give a rough sense of the proportions, the bar chart provides more precise and detailed information that is easier to interpret and compare across the different categories.
When representing data, it is crucial to choose a display that effectively communicates the information in a clear and understandable manner. In this case, the circle graph is not the most appropriate choice for displaying the volume of the Great Lakes. Here's a convincing argument for why an alternative display, such as a bar graph, would be more suitable.
Firstly, a bar graph allows for a more accurate comparison of the volumes of each Great Lake. With a circle graph, it can be challenging to estimate and compare the sizes accurately. By using a bar graph, the relative volumes of the lakes can be easily compared side-by-side at a glance. This makes it more convenient for the audience to understand the differences in volume, as the lengths of the bars directly correspond to the quantities being represented.
Secondly, a bar graph provides a better representation of the individual percentages. The circle graph only displays the percentages, without clearly indicating the exact volume associated with each lake. On the other hand, a bar graph allows for precise labeling and representation of the volumes directly on the graph. This not only helps in conveying the specific information but also allows viewers to interpret the data more accurately.
Furthermore, a bar graph also allows for the inclusion of additional information, such as labels for each bar and a clear axis that represents the volume units. These additional elements further enhance the overall understanding and interpretation of the data.
In conclusion, while the circle graph may initially appear visually appealing, for effectively conveying the volume data of the Great Lakes, a bar graph is undeniably more appropriate. It provides a clearer representation, facilitates easy comparisons, and allows for the inclusion of additional information. Therefore, I recommend using a bar graph to represent the approximate percent of the total volume of each Great Lake.