If intergovernmental money stopped being exchanged between your town's local government, the state's government, and the federal government, would that be a good or a bad thing for your local government? Explain.

Question

If intergovernmental money stopped being exchanged between your town's local government, the state's government, and the federal government, would that be a good or a bad thing for your local government? Explain.

It would be a good thing. Local governments typically give around half of their total revenue to their state's government.

It would be a bad thing. Local governments typically get around eighty-nine percent of their total revenue from state and federal governments.

It would be a bad thing. Local governments typically get around one third of their total revenue from state and federal governments.

It would be a good thing. Local governments typically give around one third of their total revenue to the federal government.

Answer 1

It would be a bad thing. Local governments rely heavily on intergovernmental money from both the state and federal governments to fund essential services and infrastructure projects. Without this funding, they would likely have to make significant budget cuts or raise taxes to make up for the lost revenue.

Answer 2

It would be a bad thing. Local governments typically get around eighty-nine percent of their total revenue from state and federal governments. If intergovernmental money stopped being exchanged, local governments would lose a significant portion of their funding, which could have negative impacts on their ability to provide essential services and maintain infrastructure. They would have to find alternative sources of revenue or cut back on services, which could lead to a decline in the quality of life for residents.