1. Social media or blogs with posts of news are often not (1 point)

entertaining.
full of celebrity gossip.
reliable.
friends’ ideas.
2. CARS is a good way to (1 point)
determine if news is trustworthy.
identify opinion pieces in a newspaper.
fact check a news story.
check a news source’s history.
3. You read that cow’s milk is the best drink for children, based on a study by the American Dairy Council. This is an example of (1 point)
research.
conflict of interest.
reasonable news.
a factual statement.
4. You read this statement in the newspaper: Our town would be better off with a skate park. This is an example of (1 point)
opinion.
fact.
exaggeration.
fake news.

5. Confirmation bias refers to the tendency of people to (1 point)

seek out information that aligns with their existing beliefs.
only trust information from credible sources.
disregard information that conflicts with their beliefs.
always believe what they hear in the news.

I apologize for the error. You are correct. The answer to question 2 is "determine if news is trustworthy." Thank you for bringing it to my attention.

can i plzz get all 4 answers

Sure! Here are the answers:

1. Social media or blogs with posts of news are often not reliable.
2. CARS is a good way to fact check a news story.
3. You read that cow’s milk is the best drink for children, based on a study by the American Dairy Council. This is an example of conflict of interest.
4. You read this statement in the newspaper: Our town would be better off with a skate park. This is an example of opinion.

And the bonus question:
5. Confirmation bias refers to the tendency of people to seek out information that aligns with their existing beliefs.

all were right except question 2,

real answer is "determine if news is trustworthy."

1. The correct answer is:

Reliable.

2. The correct answer is:
Determine if news is trustworthy.

3. The correct answer is:
Conflict of interest.

4. The correct answer is:
Opinion.

1. Social media and blogs with posts of news are often not reliable. To determine the reliability of a news source, you should consider a few factors:

First, look for trusted and reputable sources. Investigate whether the social media account or blog has a history of providing accurate and unbiased information. Check if it is affiliated with a well-known and credible news organization.

Next, cross-reference the information. Double-check the facts and claims made in the post with multiple other sources, preferably from different perspectives. This can help you identify any biases or discrepancies in the information being presented.

Additionally, consider the expertise and qualifications of the author or creator. Are they knowledgeable in the subject matter they are discussing? Do they cite credible sources, studies, or experts to support their claims?

It's important to critically evaluate the information you come across on social media and blogs, and always verify the reliability of the source before accepting it as factual.

2. CARS is a good way to fact check a news story. CARS stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasoning, and Support. It is a critical thinking framework that helps evaluate the trustworthiness and reliability of a news source or article.

When using CARS, start by assessing the credibility of the news source by researching its reputation, checking if it has a history of accuracy, and determining if it adheres to journalistic standards.

Then, look for accuracy in the information being presented. Double-check facts, figures, and claims made in the news story. Verify the information using multiple sources and consider if there is any bias or skewed interpretation affecting the accuracy.

Next, consider the reasoning behind the article. Evaluate if the argument presented is logical, supported by evidence, and follows a rational train of thought. Look for any fallacies or manipulation of facts.

Lastly, check for support in the form of credible sources, data, or expert opinions. Reliable news stories should provide transparent sources that can be independently verified.

By using the CARS framework, you can critically evaluate the trustworthiness and accuracy of a news story, helping you make informed judgments about its credibility.

3. The statement that cow's milk is the best drink for children, based on a study by the American Dairy Council, is an example of a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest occurs when a person or organization has a vested interest that could potentially compromise their objectivity.

In this case, the American Dairy Council has a clear interest in promoting the consumption of cow's milk since it is associated with the dairy industry. Therefore, their study may be biased and aimed at promoting their own product rather than providing impartial and reliable information.

When evaluating news or research, it's essential to consider any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the credibility or objectivity of the source. Look for studies conducted by independent research institutions or those without any financial or personal stakes in the outcome.

4. The statement "Our town would be better off with a skate park" is an example of an opinion. Opinions express personal beliefs, perspectives, or preferences, and they are subjective in nature.

Facts, on the other hand, are objective and verifiable. They are based on evidence and can be proven or disproven. For example, stating the population of a town or the number of parks it currently has would be considered a fact.

Exaggeration refers to the act of making something seem larger, more important, or worse than it actually is. Fake news, on the other hand, refers to intentionally fabricated or misleading information presented as news.

In the given statement, the opinion is expressed that having a skate park would improve the town. It is subjective and depends on personal preferences or beliefs.

When consuming news, it's important to differentiate between facts, opinions, exaggerations, and fake news. Understanding these distinctions allows you to critically evaluate the information presented and form well-informed judgments.