How were the invasions of China and Poland different?(1 point)
Responses
The Nazi invasion of Poland took longer than Japan’s invasion of China.
The Nazi invasion of Poland took longer than Japan’s invasion of China.
The invasion of Poland started World War II.
The invasion of Poland started World War II.
The Nazi invasion of Poland was opposed by Western nations, while Japan’s invasion of China was not.
The Nazi invasion of Poland was opposed by Western nations, while Japan’s invasion of China was not.
The invasion of China started World War II.
Incorrect. The invasion of Poland started World War II, not China.
Why couldn’t the League of Nations protect Ethiopia from Italian invasion?(1 point)
Responses
The League of Nations could not take direct action against Italy.
The League of Nations could not take direct action against Italy.
The League of Nations supported Italy in its invasion.
The League of Nations supported Italy in its invasion.
The League of Nations was addressing the Nazi invasions.
The League of Nations was addressing the Nazi invasions.
Ethiopia was not a member of the League of Nations.
Incorrect. The League of Nations was not able to take direct action against Italy, as members were not willing to participate in military action.
To understand how the invasions of China and Poland were different, we need to look at the key points provided:
1. The Nazi invasion of Poland took longer than Japan’s invasion of China.
This implies that the duration of the invasions was different. To find out how long each invasion lasted, we can search historical records or relevant sources that provide information about the timeline of the invasions. By comparing the duration of the invasions, we can determine if one took longer than the other.
2. The invasion of Poland started World War II.
This statement suggests that the invasion of Poland played a significant role in the outbreak of World War II. To confirm this, we need to examine historical sources that explain the causes and events leading up to the start of World War II. By analyzing these sources, we can determine if the invasion of Poland was indeed the trigger for the war.
3. The Nazi invasion of Poland was opposed by Western nations, while Japan’s invasion of China was not.
This statement highlights the difference in international reactions to the two invasions. To verify this claim, we can refer to historical records, news articles, or scholarly sources that discuss the international response to both invasions. By examining this information, we can confirm whether Western nations opposed the Nazi invasion of Poland while Japan's invasion of China did not face as much opposition.
4. The invasion of China started World War II.
This statement suggests that the invasion of China had a significant role in starting World War II. To determine the accuracy of this statement, we can study historical sources that explain the causes and events leading up to the outbreak of the war. By analyzing these sources, we can establish whether the invasion of China played a crucial role in starting World War II.
By referring to credible historical sources and conducting research on each of these points, we can find the necessary information to understand how the invasions of China and Poland were different.