The Supreme Court protections detailed in Escobedo v. Illinois and Gideon v. Wainwright are examples of rights protected under which clause of the U.S. Constitution?
Responses
Establishment Clause
Establishment Clause
Due Process Clause
Due Process Clause
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Due Process Clause
The Supreme Court protections detailed in Escobedo v. Illinois and Gideon v. Wainwright are examples of rights protected under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The Supreme Court protections detailed in Escobedo v. Illinois and Gideon v. Wainwright are examples of rights protected under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
To arrive at this answer, it is important to understand the basic concept of the Due Process Clause and how it relates to the Supreme Court cases mentioned.
The Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. It ensures that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This clause serves as a safeguard against arbitrary government actions and guarantees certain fundamental rights and protections.
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) was a landmark Supreme Court case that established an accused person's right to have an attorney present during custodial interrogation. In this case, the Court held that denying the defendant's request for a lawyer violated his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) was another influential Supreme Court case that established the right to counsel for indigent defendants in criminal cases. The Court held that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of the right to counsel applies to state criminal proceedings through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Therefore, the protections outlined in Escobedo v. Illinois and Gideon v. Wainwright are examples of rights protected under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.