Why is this now considered a “cautionary tale” for those interested in maintaining ecosystems and animal biodiversity? What can we learn from humans and pumas? Answer the question with details from the graph, be thorough in your answer. (2-3 sentences)
This is now considered a "cautionary tale" because the graph shows a decline in puma population following the decline in deer population, which resulted in an increase in coyote population. This cycle of population decline and rise can have a ripple effect on the entire ecosystem, leading to a decrease in animal biodiversity. We can learn from this that maintaining a balanced ecosystem and preserving biodiversity is crucial for the survival of all species.
This case study featuring humans and pumas is considered a "cautionary tale" for maintaining ecosystems and animal biodiversity because it highlights the negative consequences of human activities on wildlife populations. From the graph, we can observe that as human development and urbanization increase, puma populations decline. This indicates the detrimental impact of human encroachment on their habitats and emphasizes the need for conservation efforts to protect biodiversity and maintain healthy ecosystems.
To answer the question and understand why this is considered a "cautionary tale" for ecosystem maintenance and animal biodiversity, we need to analyze the graph provided. Start by examining the population trend of both humans and pumas over time. Look for any patterns or relationships, such as population size, growth, or decline. Then, observe any correlation between the decline of puma population and human population growth. Additionally, consider any factors like habitat loss, human-wildlife conflict, or ecosystem imbalance that may have contributed to puma population decline. By evaluating these details, we can draw conclusions about the lessons to be learned for ecosystem management and protection of animal biodiversity.
